September 28, 2002As
Thousands of Salmon Die, Fight for River Erupts Again
By TIMOTHY
EGAN
EATTLE,
Sept. 27 — More than 10,000 chinook salmon have died in the Klamath
River in northern California in recent days, leaving biologists
stunned and Indian tribes and fishermen angered at the Bush
administration, which they say caused the deaths by favoring farmers
in one of the most contentious water disputes in the West.
Federal officials, while not conceding that administration policy
had anything to do with the die-off, said they would reverse an
earlier policy and begin releasing water from Upper Klamath Lake in
southern Oregon in an effort to revitalize the Klamath River
downstream. The slow-moving river is littered with thousands of dead,
bloated salmon, rotting in the sun.
Biologists say they have never seen a salmon kill of this size. It
comes six months after the Bush administration decided to divert more
Klamath Lake water to irrigation in the Klamath basin, saying the
decision would satisfy farmers and comply with environmental laws.
Indian tribes and fishermen say the administration broke the law —
and starved the river — by favoring farmers over fish.
"We're seeing dead fish everywhere; it's just tragic," said David
Hillemeier, a biologist with the Yurok Indian Tribe in northern
California. "No matter what happens now, the damage is done. We could
lose 30,000 fish."
Although biologists disagree on what caused the fish to die, they
say a very warm and dry September in the Pacific Northwest and low
water flows in the Klamath River are the two major reasons the river
is too low for fish to move upstream and spawn, as they would normally
do this time of year. Instead, the fish are crowded into small pools
and dying of disease.
On Thursday, fishermen and environmental groups went to federal
court in Oakland, Calif., charging the Bush administration with giving
too much water to irrigation interests at the risk of thousands of
salmon, including coho, which are listed as threatened with
extinction, and king salmon, or chinook, which are considered the most
desirable and grow to 70 pounds or more.
"Basically, the administration created a drought in the lower
river," said Zeke Grader, with the Pacific Coast Federation of
Fishermen, the largest trade group of salmon fishers on the West
Coast.
"We were expecting a really good run of fish this year. And now
we've got the federal government essentially killing fish to satisfy
their irrigation interests."
Bush officials said they had acted on the best information from
scientists and were baffled by the death of the salmon. Allocating
more water to irrigators, who staged protests last summer when they
were denied their usual amount of water for farming, may not have been
a factor in the die-off, the officials said.
"It's an anomaly," said Mark Limbaugh, director of external affairs
at the Bureau of Reclamation, which controls water in the upper
Klamath Basin. "No one has ever seen a problem like this, and it may
very well turn out to be a natural phenomenon."
The Indians say that the warm and dry weather has not affected any
river except the Klamath and that the fish die-off can be directly
tied to the withholding of river water.
"We begged them for more water, starting in the spring," said Sue
Mastern, chairwoman of the Yurok Indian Tribe, which has 4,500 members
and lives in northern California. "They would not consult with us.
They ignored us. And now people are feeling helpless and outraged.
It's just a sickening feeling."
Just six months ago, the Bush administration held an elaborate
ceremony in Klamath Falls, where officials released water for
irrigation that had been held up because of concerns for endangered
fish. As farmers chanted, "Let the water flow," Bush officials
unveiled a 10-year plan that they said would settle the water war, one
of the biggest in the West.
Property rights groups and farm interests portrayed the fight as a
battle between sucker fish, which live in Upper Klamath Lake and were
dying because of little water, and farmers, who depend on backed up
river water to irrigate 200,000 acres. The downstream salmon, and the
Indians and fishermen who depend on them, were largely forgotten in
the debate, though some biologists warned that there was not enough
water to satisfy all the interests.
Under Indian treaty law, the federal government has a "trust"
responsibility to tribes and their water, fishing and property rights.
"This water will be released beginning today to meet tribal trust
responsibilities and to support the migrating salmon during this
emergency," Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton said. "We are doing our
best to respond to this situation."
Federal officials say the water release, which they call a "pulse"
and will go on for 14 days, may not be enough to help the thousands of
fast-dying fish. "No one is certain exactly what effect the water will
have on fish," said Steve Williams, director of the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service. "But we are all determined to do something to
quickly address the situation."
Fish runs vary greatly. The 10,000 fish killed this week are more
than the river's entire salmon population in some years. Other years,
like this one, are more bountiful, and biologists had been expecting a
big run on the Klamath.
It will take about three days for today's first release of water to
make it downstream to where the fish are trapped in warm pools. The
release comes at a time when irrigators say they have adequate water
to give some back to fish.
"We believe increasing the flows is justified at this time," said
Dan Keppen, executive director of the Klamath Water Users Association,
which represents 1,500 farm families. "We had an extra slug of water
available, and we've got a cushion right now."
Indians and fishermen say it is precisely that extra water that
should have gone to other needs of the river starting last spring.
"It's been clear all summer long that this river is ailing," said
Kristen Boyles, a lawyer with Earthjustice, an environmental legal
group, which is suing the administration on behalf of fishing groups
and others. "Now we have this massive die-off, and it's the result of
six months of water mismanagement."
Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company